By Mark Peranson

A lot has happened just in the past few months in the film biz, considering that a fair number of us still aren’t supposed to leave our homes for non-essential reasons, cinemas still remain closed in many places at the time of writing, and publications still insist on releasing top-ten lists before the year is over. We are going through the process of forced adaptation, which is, pace Sontag, like a foreign object entering a body and the body having to react and adapt, hopefully for the positive, which is what is happening metaphorically in the film world right now. The idea of a vaccine presumes that once we have reached herd immunity, things can go back to the way things were…is that the way it will work in the distribution and exhibition world? That’s what Warner Bros. seems to think. (After all, the mostly virus-free China is going just fine, unless you are the producers of Monster Hunter.) But what if the shift to streaming is a virus that keeps mutating and can’t be stopped? Do we really want to make movies great again? Can we?

As I write and you read, it’s become clear that we will have a full year without a “normal” festival circuit, with Berlin being the latest to have to modify plans for a public event. As someone who was involved in trying to think of how a festival could possibly function without an online component, I can attest that these issues remain problematic and the current results are compromises that, as it is in their nature, please nobody. Much more detail is required to hash this out, and festivals have different qualities, but in a nutshell, festivals have two reasons to exist: to present films to a viewing public (whether in or outside a cinema doesn’t seems to matter currently, so let’s dispense with a collective, in-person experience as a necessary component), and, here I would say more importantly, choose which films to present. 

The idea of a festival as a firewall seems to be stating the obvious, but 2020 has answered the question: what if you throw a film festival and nobody shows up? The curatorial purpose of film festivals, and how they can play a part in a changing distribution landscape—by highlighting films and providing the initial platform for presenting them to the industry and an international audience (domestic audiences will matter less and less, it’s just a fact)—is the reason why we’re all struggling to keep them going when it would just be easier, and less financially crippling, to flat out cancel not only 2020 but also 2021. This remains essential, as otherwise we’ll just leave it entirely up to Netflix et al. to determine what will be available to be seen. Because even if the actual vaccine does its work, the virus has infiltrated this business and it will keep mutating. 

Which brings me back to thinking about the purpose of a film magazine like this, which some folks would say has outlived its usefulness, and failed to adapt to changes in things like, but not exclusive to, film criticism—the rapidity with which people online insult, debate, insult, conclude, then move on within a week of a film being released (or dropped) until the next hot topic comes around, and which will spiral as global piracy enters its golden age. Though some new films have been released (or dropped) in the past year, which even made it possible for us to put together a “Fall Festival Spotlight” (laugh if you wish, but a lot of work was done to keep these festivals alive), there has certainly been a shift to writing about films that people who aren’t global travellers have the chance to see, sooner, though without the rush to throw something online within the week. Or even, as we see in the pages that follow, to pick up a book, which doesn’t just mean “reading film criticism” in the traditional sense, but sometimes treating a book as a film. However tantalizing the prospect is theoretically, I don’t think that it’s possible to have a film magazine where nobody shows up to read, so let me conclude with another plea for support, because maybe the sole thing that is within our control is to continue to resist together.

Tagged with →  


Friend me on FacebookFollow me on TwitterRSS Feed

From the Magazine

  • Cinema Scope Issue 86 Table of Contents

    The Cinema Scope Top Ten of 2020 Interviews The Girl and the Spider *En plein air: Denis Côté on Hygiène sociale by Jordan Cronk *The More →

  • The Cinema Scope Top Ten of 2020

    1. Days (Tsai Ming-liang) 2. The Works and Days (of Tayoko Shiojiri in the Shiotani Basin) (C.W. Winter and Anders Edström) 3. The Year of More →

  • The Primacy of Perception: Ramon & Silvan Zürcher on The Girl and the Spider

    Near the midpoint of The Girl and the Spider—Ramon and Silvan Zürcher’s overdue, much anticipated follow-up to their masterful debut feature, The Strange Little Cat (2013)—a character launches into another of the Zürcher brothers’ distinctive anecdotal monologues. Mara (Henriette Confurius), who is as close as this film gets to a protagonist, describes for her neighbour, Kerstin (Dagna Litzenberger-Vinet), an incident that occurred the previous day between herself and her newly ex-roommate (and perhaps ex-girlfriend) Lisa (Liliane Amuat). “I was in my room while Lisa was on the toilet,” she recounts. “She asked me to bring her a roll of toilet paper. Instead of giving it to her, I walked past the door from left to right, from Lisa’s point of view.” The image cuts to the scene while she recalls it, privileging us with a more objective account of the incident: a fixed shot showing Mara stand up from her desk, grab a package of toilet paper, and march past the door, her arms outstretched like a zombie. More →

  • Exploded View: Steina & Woody Vasulka

    Icelandic filmmaker Hrafnhildur Gunnarsdóttir’s extraordinarily warming 2019 documentary The Vasulka Effect, about the protean Euro-hippies and rightfully dubbed “grandparents of video art,” Steina and Woody Vasulka, was exactly the movie I needed to see this winter. Awash in Nordic echoes even as it confronts the modern realities of art-gallery politics and the history of America’s visual-arts fringes, it’s a mythical origin story that’s actually true, all about ancient heroes and ravaging time. More →

  • Canadiana | Reading Aids: The Good Woman of Sichuan and Ste. Anne

    When navigating the as-yet-unknown films of a festival program, nationality still provides a persuasive point of reference for some, a feeling underlined by the proud declarations issued by national funding organizations, promotional bodies, or particularly partisan members of the press once titles have been announced. This year’s reduced Berlinale Forum lineup also invites tenuous lines of this kind to be drawn (two films from Argentina, two films from Canada!), although the three Franco-German co-productions shot elsewhere say far more about how films are made in 2021. More →